CA: Prostitution Surveillance Video Recording Tower Goes Up in San Diego

Source: reason.com 8/5/24

Warrantless surveillance, Comic Con “sex trafficking,” and the persistence of trafficking myths

Moral panic about sex work leads to law enforcement practices that reach far beyond anyone engaged in or with erotic labor. The latest example comes from San Diego County, California, where cops are putting up a creepy surveillance tower under the auspice of stopping sex sellers and sex buyers from meeting.

The prostitution surveillance tower, stationed along National City’s Roosevelt Avenue, will record video of anyone who happens to be in the area.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

21 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What a wonderful WASTE of taxpayer money! How do they ID perpetrators while they’re in Cosplay? How do they distinguish one Slave Leia from another or Darth Vaders for that matter? Can’t see this work at all…

It needs to be torn down.

Lets say a girl is there offering herself and her brother or father shows up and convinces her to get in the car so he can take her home to get her some help. Is that guy going to get charged for soliciting? What if a girl is there and calls a friend to come pick her up and take her to her home because she doesn’t want to sell herself any more?
How exactly are these cameras going to distinguish between actual prostitution and the examples I just gave?
If I had a sister or a friend who was engaging in prostitution and she called me and asked me to come help her, you’re damn right I’m going to go get her and get her off the street. How would I be breaking the law?

This is great follow up to the post I posted last week about this “sting” here which also debunks (again) the theory major sporting events are the only alleged places where these things happen due to alleged trafficking for over-amped drunk sports fans. Who’d thunk those who attended such events were such pervs (sarc) (were they really attending this event?) or just in the area where the allegations were happening because that is where the sting was placed by LE since the DA said it is a place it could happen (making themselves look good of course)? Doesn’t one usually go to the area where things are allegedly sold if that is what they are looking for? What is stopping LE from placing a sting outside a major children’s pizza chain or arcade under the guise of trying to “save just one from the suspicious white trolling van”? That’d make headlines and garner more funding, right?! It is interesting because in theory, one can sell their body anywhere (even without Backpage being around anymore) regardless of a major event such as this or not. Were the major political conventions targeted for stings like this? Shouldn’t they be? You can get more funding at one and defunded at another (where my body my choice is present except for situations such as this which you don’t have the legal choice). There has to be a politician or two who will scream the loudest about wanting more laws to combat this only to be a consumer of such.

Did they (SD LE) just happen to do it here to most likely try to restore some cred to their damaged rep they’ve suffered due to their own idiocy, e.g., jail deaths, bad commissioners, etc that are in SD County? You have to wonder…

Last edited 4 months ago by TS

Prostitution should not be illegal. Just like plenty of other things.

It is not anyone’s business if some adults want to have SEX with each other and exchange whatever they like between themselves. People who think it should be illegal should not fool themselves into believing that they have done anything good for the world or humanity. Just like so many things that busybody Karens muck around in, they have made any problems around it worse. And when government is involved, there is NO problem that they cannot make worse.

No one should delude themselves that Amerika is a free country. It very much is not. Never has been.

Just like the registry – a cosmetic display of addressing a problem (and I suspect a grossly overstated one) that accomplishes absolutely nothing.

I’m sure whoever proposed this idiocy will be campaigning on it.

I agree with Will Allen – sex between consenting adults (even prostitution) should not be illegal. BUT …. if legislators want to support S.O. Registries, I want to see ALL those who break sex laws – including a “John” who purchases sex from a prostitute – should be listed on their beloved Registries!! When legislators’ husbands, brothers, sons, neighbors, coworkers and constituents suddenly find THEMSELVES listed on the Registry, maybe then things will start to change at a more rapid pace!!